Rolling Stone's ridiculous justification for omitting Celine Dion from their controversial ❝200 Greatest Singers of All Time❞ list? Don't be mad at us they say, because this is a ❝singers❞ list... not a ❝voices❞ one.
Huh? And just when I thought ❝great singer❞ and ❝great voice❞ were both suppose to be synonymous.
Before you start scrolling (and commenting), keep in mind that this is the Greatest Singers list, not the Greatest Voices List. Talent is impressive; genius is transcendent.https://t.co/hN41UoRGL7
— Rolling Stone (@RollingStone) January 2, 2023
Pretty much as I stated in the Celine post. With that said, I do think Michael should definitely have been included in the list.
ReplyDeleteHe is. But they placed him at a paltry #86. Definitely deserved much higher. They put singers like Ariana Grande before him which is laughable.
ReplyDeleteTrolling Stones wanted to troll us all in 2023 & get themselves “relevant” & so far they are succeeding since people are talking about them & clickin on their article. The 2nd i opened that article & saw how low Aguilera & Clarkson were knowing Rihanna & others were on that list too, i was like “not today Satan”!
ReplyDeleteYes Opinions are personal but this right here was made with the sole purpose to create a buzz…not giving them that energy! (The word “singers” should not have been USED here…specially if u not including Celine Dion, Toni Braxton or Lara Fabian!)
Where Madonna?
ReplyDelete